Commonly searched drugs
Also, wet-dry interface areas can result in corrosion. Using this analogy, in the one case, the electrical configuration is like a bundle of vertically stacked resistors say each 1 meter long, one for each frequency and GHG that are all tied together so there is no difference in potential at the end of each resistor, and at each elevation, the resistor with the lowest resistance of course carries the most current. The most common image of an absorbance measurement is a solution in a cuvette, measured in transmission with a dual-beam spectrometer — the classic introductory chemistry lab experiment. I am prescribed 16 mg a day. Gas stream Liquid stream Liquid and gas streams Energy source: However, in many cases, the best operating conditions for particles collection are the poorest for gas removal.
Some advantages of wet scrubbers over these devices are as follows:. Some disadvantages of wet scrubbers include corrosion, the need for entrainment separation or mist removal to obtain high efficiencies and the need for treatment or reuse of spent liquid. Wet scrubbers have been used in a variety of industries such as acid plants , fertilizer plants, steel mills , asphalt plants, and large power plants. Various factors in addition to time and use can cause a chemical or particulate scrubber to degrade and operate less efficiently.
Unfortunately, if your equipment is not working properly, your operations could be negatively affected, and because of this, it is extremely important to conduct scrubber repairs, retrofits and upgrades as soon as they are needed. Here are the most common issues for wet scrubbers:. Since wet scrubbers vary greatly in complexity and method of operation, devising categories into which all of them neatly fit is extremely difficult.
Scrubbers for particle collection are usually categorized by the gas-side pressure drop of the system. Gas-side pressure drop refers to the pressure difference, or pressure drop , that occurs as the exhaust gas is pushed or pulled through the scrubber, disregarding the pressure that would be used for pumping or spraying the liquid into the scrubber.
However, most scrubbers operate over a wide range of pressure drops , depending on their specific application, thereby making this type of categorization difficult. Another way to classify wet scrubbers is by their use - to primarily collect either particulates or gaseous pollutants.
Again, this distinction is not always clear since scrubbers can often be used to remove both types of pollutants. Wet scrubbers can also be categorized by the manner in which the gas and liquid phases are brought into contact.
Scrubbers are designed to use power, or energy, from the gas stream or the liquid stream, or some other method to bring the pollutant gas stream into contact with the liquid.
These categories are given in Table 2. Corrosion can be a prime problem associated with chemical industry scrubbing systems. Fibre-reinforced plastic and dual keys are often used as most dependable materials of construction. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
February Learn how and when to remove this template message. Particle collection in wet scrubbers. Air Pollution Control Technology. Control of Gaseous Emissions. Practical process design of particulate scrubbers. Retrieved from " https: Pollution control technologies Air pollution control systems Particulate control NOx control Volatile organic compound abatement Acid gas control Scrubbers Gas technologies.
Therefore, vessel sizes, including fans and ducts downstream, are smaller than those of other control devices. Smaller sizes result in lower capital costs and more flexibility in site location of the scrubber.
No secondary dust sources: Once particulate matter is collected, it cannot escape from hoppers or during transport. The sweet spot for measuring absorbance with best accuracy is between 0. Featured Products for Absorbance in Solutions: Making Measurements What light source should I use for illumination?
This will really depend on the molecule or substance you want to measure. Chromophores are substances that absorb visible light, giving them a colored appearance.
These can be conveniently measured with visible light. Not all molecules, however, absorb in the visible. Transitions between different electronic energy states often require high-energy, shorter-wavelength light in the ultraviolet or visible. Vibrational energy level transitions, on the other hand, tend to be at longer wavelengths in the near-infrared and infrared hence the popularity of IR and Raman spectroscopy for chemical identification.
The electronic transitions that give rise to absorption spectra are almost always overlaid with vibrational and rotational states of the same molecule, making the peaks typically broad.
Use of a light source that covers only the wavelength range of interest will help reduce stray light, which is particularly important for higher absorbance readings. The broad, smoothly varying output of a tungsten halogen light source is ideal for absorption at visible wavelengths. The LS-1 is the most economical, and comes in long-lifetime and rack mounted versions.
The HL has very similar spectral output, and has additional shuttered and high power versions. The bluLoop is an LED-based light source with four different bulbs to yield balanced spectral output over the visible range and greater intensity at blue wavelengths. A deuterium and tungsten based light source has a broad, smoothly varying spectrum and stable output from to nm, making it well suited to most absorbance measurements.
Since its output comes from two different bulbs, the UV and visible portions of the spectrum can be used separately to reduce stray light and optimize signal to noise. The DH comes in a shuttered version for light-sensitive samples, and in a balanced version where the strong deuterium emission line at nm is attenuated. A xenon light source would not usually be recommended for absorbance measurements, as it has a jagged, pulsed spectrum, making averaging and boxcar smoothing absolutely necessary to get good quality measurements.
It also features the ability to switch the visible portion off to focus on UV wavelengths and reduce stray light. Even though intensity decreases at the longer wavelengths, this effect is compensated by higher sensitivity of the detectors in our NIR spectrometers at those wavelengths.
The Vivo NIR light source is also a tungsten halogen light source, and uses four spatially separated bulbs to avoid overheating the sample. What is the best sampling optic for my measurement? The most common way to measure the absorbance of a solution is in a standard 1 cm pathlength cuvette, whether it be a disposable plastic UV-VIS cuvette or a high-quality quartz cuvette. This is typically a good pathlength unless the sample happens to be very high or very low concentration.
If extinction coefficient is being measured, it is very important to use a high-quality quartz cuvette for which the pathlength is accurately known. What spectrometer should I use for detection?
The spectrometer in an absorbance system needs to match the wavelength range of interest, and have the right sensitivity for the sampling optic being used.
A preconfigured UV-VIS or VIS-NIR spectrometer works well for most cuvette-based measurements, but a more sensitive spectrometer may be needed for measurements in low volume cells or with fiber optics probes. When stray light must be minimized for maximum accuracy or low absorbance solutions, however, a Torus or QE65 Pro spectrometer may be a better option. It also has excellent thermal stability, making it well-suited to extended kinetics measurements and precision measurements of optically dense solutions.
The QE Pro delivers similar high thermal stability, high sensitivity, and low stray light 0. It can be configured with a range of gratings to achieve 0. One advantage of this high-performance unit is that it features a replaceable slit design for maximum flexibility. Are there any integrated systems I can use? Just keep in mind that they tend to use uncollimated light, so not all light incident on the sample travels the same pathlength. This makes them suitable for relative absorbance measurements where concentration is to be determined from a calibration curve, but not for absolute measurements of pathlength or extinction coefficient.
These can be attractive for educational labs since they eliminate the risk of broken fibers entirely. Even the light source draws its power from the USB in the case of the visible unit. Why do I need a reference measurement? In an absorbance experiment, light is attenuated not only by the solution, but also by the solvent and reflections from every interface in the light path.
In the case of a cuvette-based measurement, the appropriate reference would be the cuvette filled with just the solvent. Ensure that no dust or fingerprints are on the transmitting surfaces, as these will add scatter and absorbance signatures of their own. If the sample is in a buffer solution, the reference must be the buffer solution with no sample present.
In dual beam spectrophotometers, the reference solution would be placed in a reference slot for direct comparison for the duration of the experiment. When using an Ocean Optics spectrometer, you simply store a reference spectrum and then replace the cuvette with the sample to be measured. The software takes care of subtracting the reference spectrum, as well as applying any other correction factors that are selected. It is a good idea to look at the reference solution periodically as a gauge of system drift.
Drift can be caused by lamp intensity variations, changes in temperature, or even changes in the reference solution depending on the chemistry. It takes very little time to take a new dark and a new reference measurement, so it is good practice to do so frequently while making measurements.
Do I need an absorbance standard? Absorbance standards are used to verify the accuracy and consistency of response of an absorbance system relative to NIST-traceable standards. This is required as part of quality control procedures in biomedical and pharmaceutical industries, as well as the food and beverage, petrochemical, semiconductor, and pulp and paper industries. Neutral density filters can be used for the same purpose, but do not assess factors like staff ability to prepare stock solutions, liquid and cuvette handling procedures, or the quality of cuvettes being used.
They are provided with absorbance charts for each solution, collected using NIST-calibrated instruments. Why is stray light important? Stray light refers to any light that reaches the detector via scattering. This can include light that did not travel through the sample, or photons of the wrong wavelength hitting a pixel.
Stray light has many sources, including ambient light that leaks into the instrument, light that bypasses the sample like light that gets wave-guided through a cuvette wall , higher-order diffraction from the grating, and scattering from optical surfaces inside the spectrometer. Even when a spectrophotometer is designed to minimize stray light effects, there is a physical limit imposed by the zero-order scattering of the grating.
Fortunately the stray light of an instrument can be measured and a correction applied in software. Stray light I s always appears as additional signal in both the sample I and reference I 0 measurement in the absorbance equation:. When the absorbance equals zero, like when the reference solution is inserted as the sample, the stray light terms cancel out. As absorbance increases, I decreases and stray light begins to affect the absorbance value, reducing it from the true value.
At very low light levels, the stray light, I s , approaches or exceeds the transmitted light, I , and becomes the dominant term.
At this point, it becomes the limiting factor for the absorbance that can be measured. When the stray light of a system is quantified, it is usually expressed as a percentage of the reference value. Our spectrometer models with the lowest stray light are the Torus 0. As shown in the figure below, absorbance readings in the 0. Since stray light is a property of both the spectrometer and of the light source used, it must be characterized at the system level.
One method is to measure absorbance using a highly concentrated sample. For example, if the concentrated sample is known to have an absorbance near 5, then the light reaching the detector would be reduced by a factor of 10, Any light measured above this level could be considered stray light. A longpass filter can also be used, as these are designed to block by 5 or more orders of magnitude at the shorter wavelengths.
When using an Ocean Optics spectrometer, the stray light value can be entered into the software and then scaled and subtracted from all other readings. Note that stray light varies with wavelength. Near infrared wavelengths often contribute more than others to stray light, so using a shortpass filter prior to the spectrometer may help to reduce the amount of stray light reaching the spectrometer detector.
Reducing stray light can also be as simple as turning off the tungsten halogen light source when working at wavelengths covered by the deuterium portion of the light source, or using a bandpass filter to limit the light source to illumination over only the wavelength range of interest. How do I use Beer's Law to calculate concentration or extinction coefficient? This can also help to remove errors that are particular to the experiment, the equipment, or the particular set of samples being studied.
First, carefully prepare a series of standard solutions for which the concentrations are known, and then measure their absorption as a function of wavelength. For most compounds, there is typically at least one wavelength where the sample absorption peaks.
Choose one of these wavelengths to monitor and create your calibration curve. As an example, the graph below shows the calibration curve for calcium dipicolinic acid in deionized water.
Measurements were taken at nm, the wavelength of maximum absorbance for this sample. The reference was pure deionized water. Using this graph, the concentrations of unknown samples can easily be calculated using the slope of the line.
Similarly, the extinction coefficient can be determined if the other parameters are known. For the most accurate results, it is best to use ten or more data points evenly distributed over the desired interpolation range. Four points does not a calibration make! Using a calibration curve conveniently eliminates the need to know the extinction coefficient or exact pathlength.
This is handy, because very few chemicals come with a molar absorptivity curve for the exact solvent being used. It also allows the use of a sample holder of unknown pathlength, provided it is used consistently. If the calibration curve turns out to be non-linear, it can still be used by fitting a polynomial function to the data. Interpolations have the potential to be just as accurate as those from a linear calibration curve, as accuracy is dependent on the quality of the curve fit, not the shape of the line.
Deviations from linearity may indicate chemistry that is occurring within the sample, including, but not limited to, other species and changing equilibrium conditions. So before a nonlinear calibration curve is used, it is a good idea to verify the result using a fresh set of standard solutions. All calibrations will be non-linear if a wide enough range of concentrations are used due to stray light and of limitations in the instrument.
The detector measures the numbers of photons striking the detector during the integration time. Those photons arrive randomly, and the random variation in how many photons strike the detector is equal to the square root of the number of photons an effect called shot noise. At high absorbance values, the number of photons reaching the detector is low and the signal-to-noise is relatively poor. At low absorbance values, there are plenty of photons and higher signal-to-noise. However, the uncertainty in measuring the percent transmission dominates the error in the measured absorbance value.
In other words, the spectrometer is not as sensitive to small changes in absorbance concentration when absorbance is already low.
The ideal range to work in is from about 0. By adjusting the concentration of the samples through dilution, by choosing cuvettes of different pathlength, or both, the absorbance values measured can be adjusted to be in this range to get the most accurate results.
What's the difference between relative and absolute absorbance? If the illumination is diffuse, there will be a variety of paths taken through the cuvette, resulting in an average pathlength for the combined cuvette and system that differs from the specified length of the cuvette being used.
Uncollimated light through a sample. Collimated light through a sample. If diffuse illumination is combined with collimated detection using a lens for light gathering , the result is a relative absorbance measurement.
That is, the absorbance reading for a specific sample will depend on the specific instrument used. Our direct-attach and integrated cuvette holders provide diffuse illumination to the cuvette via light focused directly from a bulb. Transmission dip probes and flow cells are also relative absorbance sampling optics.
Collimated illumination combined with collimated detection results in absolute absorbance measurements, which are independent of the instrument used to make the measurement. Any of our cuvette holders which use a fiber and collimating lens combination provide collimated illumination, as the light exiting the fiber does so with a well-defined range of angles, allowing proper collimation. Be aware, however, that making adjustments to the position of the collimating lens in these cuvette holders will affect collimation of the incident light.
Relative absorbance systems work very well for determining concentration when used with a calibration curve. They are not suitable, however, for determining extinction coefficients, as the exact optical pathlength is not known. Absolute absorbance sampling optics:. How do I take the best dark measurement? When taking a dark measurement, it is best to block the light at the light source if possible.
Turning the light source off and then on again will throw the light source out of thermal equilibrium and require a new reference measurement.
Alternatively, many cuvette holders have a filter slot where the light can be blocked. Paper, even cardboard, can be deceptively transmitting, and it only takes a very low level of light to affect a measurement.